Friday, November 30, 2007
IT'S TIME FOR AN OLIO POST
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
WELCOME TO MEXICO, YANKEE
There is an article in the header that shows why an immigrant is against Driver's Licenses for illegals. Just click it.
I wanted to get your attention for this post. I know it succeeded in a couple of cases.
.
I'm not sure which political party I'm the most disgusted with over this Driver's Licenses (DL) for illegal aliens business. .
The Democrats, in general, seem to feel that it would be ok to give them out to people who are in this country illegally. Some of the Republican candidates agree with this. .
.
I have a problem with this, however. Since the States issue DL's why should they surrender this right to the Federal government?
.
While watching the almost total lack of any action in any sphere by the sitting Senate and House representatives over the past year, it occurred to me that we don't really need any Federal law ordering the states to issue, or not issue, DLs to illegals. It has been stated that far too many bills (laws, acts, whatever) are approved or disapproved by our representatives without that person even reading them. It may sound cavalier on my part, but it has to be an ugly fact. If it isn't true, then why are so many of them bad and totally inadequate for the subject they concern? After all, the majority of our reps are college grads and the majority of them are lawyers. I've heard, from other sites, that the poor dears are so overworked they sometimes don't have time to read what they are voting on.
.
Busy with what? Well, they have to see all the lobbyists and other people with an axe to grind to help individual businesses. And then there are the (paid for) trips to other lands, vacation spots, holiday events and tours and meetings in various locations around the U.S. and the world.
.
But about issuing DLs to illegals. Is it possible that those in power don't grasp the fact that once one has a DL, it is a simple matter to register to vote? Voter registration cards are easy to get, easy to fill out and easy to return to the registrar. If you remember the application you filled out years ago, they don't even ask if you are a citizen. So I guess that means we must be quite willing to allow non-citizens to elect our law makers. Maybe we should send a few millions to China and Iran and Russia and North Korea and any other country that wants them? And let's not forget those countries that our State Department says we shouldn't visit. They'd probably love to help elect a President and Representatives for us.
.
I'm quoting from a comment in http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071115/OPINION03/711150362 "Iowa on its own, however, could issue driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. It's a matter of public safety. That's why the New Iowans Policy Task Force, created by former Gov. Tom Vilsack, asked the 2007 Legislature to consider doing just that. That idea went nowhere, and it's not likely to go anywhere in 2008, especially after what happened in New York. Ignoring the problem, however, will not make it go away."
.
Iowa, and all our states need to recognize that we, and the illegals, are a mobile country. If I can get a license from Iowa (or any other state) it is a simple matter to then apply for a new license from any other state as a new resident.
.
I seem to remember a famous American who said, unequivocally: "Beware of entangling alliances." I feel like a definite minority accepting that quote.
Friday, November 23, 2007
IS IT IN YOUR FOOD? IS THE FED IN YOUR FOOD?
If you look carefully, you'll see a little illegal alien in this picture.
The lettuce is called mache in Spanish, Valerianella locusta in Latin. It's a gourmet form of lettuce. And it is sold in many food stores in the Southwest.
I don't know anything other than that about it. Well, maybe the fact the animal is apparently a frog, carrying who knows what diseases.
In fact the idea of consuming any of this lettuce is not being given any room in my cluttered mind.
How should I put it? "There's enough s**t in my head now"? "No more p**s and vinegar, thank you"? You get the idea.
.
When America imports food stuffs don't we have the right to ask that it be readied for us by our standards?
Well, yes. And no.
Yes, we have the right to demand this from our federal and state governments.
No we don't, according to the sellers and buyers of the the raw product. (Raw seemed to fit well here.)
.
Complaining to either of these governments (ours and theirs) can be most frustrating and lead one in circles that are like crop circles (do you suppose?) that never seem to end. If you don't believe that, here's a little test you can perform.
Write down a question to ask the IRS. Call the IRS, read the question and carefully record the response with pen and paper. Hang up, call the 1-800 number again and read the same question. Write down their answer. Hang up and call the number again. Read the question. Write down their answer. The odds are all three will be different responses. Keep calling and you might get an infinite variety of answers. And the IRS cannot be held responsible if they give you the wrong answer and you wind up with a fine and late fees. That's in their rules.
Federal Income Tax was first started in 1862 to pay for the Civil War and was eliminated in 1872. Then it was revived in 1894 and declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court the next year.
In 1913, the 16th Amendment to the Constitution made the income tax a permanent blight on our lives.
The Social Security Act was signed into law in 1935 and the first payment was made into it in 1937. Under this law, only retirement benefits were paid to the primary worker. In 1939 a change in the law added survivors benefits and benefits for the retiree's spouse and children. In 1956 Disability benefits were added. The original 1935 law contained the first national unemployment compensation program, aid to the states for various health and welfare programs, and the Aid to Dependent Children program.
Franklin Roosevelt, President and multimillionaire, saw that many businesses had no retirement nor pension plans and forced the bill through a Congress who did not want it enacted. They were afraid of losing the support of big business who supplied them with perks and money for re-election campaigns.
The cost was low to the average wage earner. A few pennies out of their paychecks. People thought, correctly, that there would be some money coming in after the business world was through with them. Poor houses would become a thing of the past. And the people were right and the houses disappeared. And contentment reigned in the country. (The children of the retirees were happy that they wouldn't have to hold two jobs to support the parents in their old age. Parents were happy because they wouldn't have to take orders from their snot nosed kids. Everybody was happy.
COLA (Cost Of Living Adjustment) were first paid in 1975. Before that, Congress played the catch me when you can game before giving them raises.
However, Congress, which gives itself and the President raises when it feels like it, decided that retired people didn't need to have their COLA figured on the same basis that Federal Government employees did. Maybe they thought that retirees paid less for food, less for cars and gasoline and repairs, less for housing costs, less for clothing than gov employees. Maybe.
.
This coming year, retirees are being treated to a magnificent 2.3% COLA because of the way it is figured. (Bean counters another 1, citizens 0.) The message I see the government sending is: If you don't like it, stick it in your gas tank. I think that perhaps the last president we had who really cared about the average citizen was John F. Kennedy.
.
Oh, clicking on the header will take you into an entirely different world.
. I confess, it was a sneaky way to get into this subject.Thursday, November 22, 2007
WE'RE GIVING THANKS TODAY
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
G. W. BUSH AND HIS PECKER
- Aquarium: interactive television for cats.
- Cataclysm: any great upheaval in a cat's life.
- Catatonic: a feline medicinal drink.
- Caterpillar: a soft scratching post for a cat.
- Cat Scan: to look for a new cat.
- Dog: a cat's device for running practice.
- Im-purr-sonate: to act like the cat.
- Purr-ade: an organized march of cats.
- Purr-adise: the garden of Cats.
- Purr-amour: a cat lover.
- Purr-anoia: the fear that your cat is up to something.
- Purr-aphernalia: a cat's personal belongings.
- Purr-ch: any favored feline napping spot.
- Purr-chase: anything bought for a cat.
- Purr-fume: the scent of an open can of tuna.
- Purr-gatory: a houseful of kittens.
- Purr-petual: everlasting feline love.
- Purr-plex: a house with two or more cats.
- Purr-suit: the garment your shedding cat rubs against just as you are leaving home to go to an important meeting.
- Tuner: sonar-like device in cat food that causes cats to appear.
- Yawn: a cat's honest opinion openly expressed.
Monday, November 19, 2007
WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT?

